PDA

View Full Version : * 2004 CTR - First Press Review *



evostu
10-08-2003, 04:26 AM
Here you go Guys & Gals, sorry to make you feel down by posting this.

The overall verdict from www.civictype-r.co.uk is that the car has been softened far too much and those seats are just plain nasty.

What do you think?

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11873.jpg

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11874.jpg

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11878.jpg

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11875.jpg

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11879.jpg

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11880.jpg

Three years ago, Honda launched its clinically efficient Civic. There was no doubting the hatchback's practicality, but it never managed to offer enough character to steal sales from Ford's all-conquering Focus.

All that could be set to change with the Civic's first major facelift, which has brought in 500 subtle changes to keep small hatchback buyers interested. These include suspension modifications, upgraded trim and subtle styling tweaks to update the front and rear lights and reshape the bumpers.

With production of the revised version already underway, we grabbed the keys to the first car off the line - a flagship Type R - to see if Honda has added even more pizzazz.

Despite a dedicated band of followers, Honda's hot hatch hasn't had it all its own way. Compared to Ford's Focus ST170, the steering didn't offer enough feedback. Next to the Peugeot 206 GTi 180, the chassis lacked sparkle.

As a result, Honda's dragged the Type R back to the drawing board ready for launch next year, stiffening the suspension, revising the steering and up-dating the engine. The finishing touch is a 15mm drop in ride height to complete the car's more aggressive look.

There's no doubt that the facelift adds a fresher, more modern appearance, although the jury is still out on the delicately styled front lights.

The deeper front spoiler does add road presence, as do the twin exhausts and prominent rear wing. Inside, the sculpted bucket seats look smarter, but offer just as much support, while new silver trim adds an air of quality.

But the Type R has always been about driving, so is there a marked improvement on the open road? With a lighter flywheel and clutch, the 2.0-litre i-VTEC engine gains 3bhp and seems even keener to rev than before. Straight-line performance is improved and it's now possible to sprint from 0-62mph in just 6.6 seconds, 0.2 seconds faster than before. The top speed is unchanged at 146mph.

The way that the engine revs to its 8,000rpm red line remains simply sensational. Now, however, it feels smoother and even more responsive.

On the road, drivers will instantly notice improvements to the steering. The sporty Civic feels more responsive than before, and though the electric power assistance masks much of what is going on at the front wheels, it's more involving to drive.

Stiffer suspension helps to generate huge amounts of grip. At speeds where the old model would start to understeer, the new version chews at the tarmac, refusing to budge from the chosen line. Thankfully, the hot hatch's brakes remain extremely effective. Backed by ABS, the system stays potent, even when worked hard.

It's not all good news - the stiffer suspension has had an effect on ride quality. Even on motorways the set-up makes the Type R feel hard-edged. However, we can't help but feel that's all part of the Civic's character, and a small price to pay for better handling.

Traditionally, performance cars get softer each time they evolve. Marketing and product development departments favour refinement over outright performance in the pursuit of sales.

However, Honda's engineers have clearly decided the Type R needed greater focus if it was to challenge for the class crown. With its revised suspension, steering and engine, it's certainly taken a step in the right direction - and the price is the same as the old model's, at

r3p00c
10-08-2003, 05:29 AM
*bang*

sniperSI
10-08-2003, 05:48 AM
EvoStu, your killing me mate, your killing me!

sniperSI
10-08-2003, 05:50 AM
Is that a deeper silver color then last year?

evostu
10-08-2003, 06:15 AM
Thats a brand new color for the new model year.

It's a similar shade (but not quite as dark) to the UK/Euro Accord.

So we are destined to get 4 colors for the CTR in Europe.

Milano Red
Nighthawk Black
Satin Silver
Grey (Color name to confirmed)

Still no Championship White though. :mad:

EvoStu.

evostu
10-08-2003, 06:40 AM
Here you go guys, this really is hot off the press as the review only came out yesterday. Enjoy. :D

http://gallery.themspros.com/albums/album25/ctrreview1.sized.jpg

http://gallery.themspros.com/albums/album25/ctrreview2.sized.jpg

EvoStu.

ballsdeep
10-08-2003, 06:51 AM
I need those seats.

EP3RII
10-08-2003, 06:52 AM
Probably 'flourite silver metallic', the Accord is 'graphite pearl'.

SarahVTEC
10-08-2003, 07:22 AM
i agree. the seats are terrible. Honda should have stuck with the red Recaro's as OEM equipment, like the 30th Anniversary model. also, no championship white! c'mon Honda of UK! On the bright side, at least you guys GET to own a CTR. that's gotta be worth something.

Brettnyt
10-08-2003, 07:34 AM
Damn, check out the left side rear wheel in that first pic...

BlackNRedSi
10-08-2003, 08:15 AM
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11873.jpg


looks like the EPs Wheel gap, or has the TypeR always been like that in the gap department?

Tenacious G
10-08-2003, 08:38 AM
that wheel gap is the result of hard cornering (also the reason that CTR is doing a pissing dog). i'm sure the gap is less than the EPs.

Zero Three Si
10-08-2003, 08:49 AM
Originally posted by Tenacious G
that wheel gap is the result of hard cornering (also the reason that CTR is doing a pissing dog). i'm sure the gap is less than the EPs.

Not to mention that the other sides wheel gap is probably bottomed out in that pic.

evostu
10-08-2003, 09:00 AM
The wheel gap on the CTR is still highly unacceptable guys & gals. It's nowhere near as low as it could be.

The new 2004 model is apparently 15mm lower than the outgoing model. :mad:

EvoStu.

fyzm7357
10-08-2003, 09:08 AM
Originally posted by Tenacious G
that wheel gap is the result of hard cornering (also the reason that CTR is doing a pissing dog). i'm sure the gap is less than the EPs.

I had coffee go up my nose when I read that...I have never heard it put like that before.....funny stuff.....LOL

Tiger_Si
10-08-2003, 10:00 AM
WOW 4.76 Final drive. and 144 tq, not bad.

so is this comming or what? :mad:

enecks
10-08-2003, 10:19 AM
so is this comming or what?

don't hold your breath : (. and in the caption, they say the seats are sportier? there's no way those are sportier than the red Recaros...mmmm alcantara...

Rueda del Queso
10-08-2003, 10:38 AM
How come their type r is 100 pounds lighter than our si?

2k2_nbp_egg
10-08-2003, 10:53 AM
Type R's usually have less sound deadening shit and lighter components all together, so I wouldnt doubt that it's lighter. Idunno about 100 pounds, but i'm really liking that color. I can't believe that article compared it to a ferrari tho. It's almost like honda paid that guy or something...."the sexed up model" ?

evostu
10-08-2003, 10:59 AM
Originally posted by 2k2_nbp_egg
Type R's usually have less sound deadening shit and lighter components all together, so I wouldnt doubt that it's lighter. Idunno about 100 pounds, but i'm really liking that color. I can't believe that article compared it to a ferrari tho. It's almost like honda paid that guy or something...."the sexed up model" ?

This Type R believe it or not is actually heavier than the outgoing model. They have added more sound proofing to the vehicle to make it more acceptable to the general public.

It kinda defeats the object of it being a Type R!!!!

EvoStu.

bao_pay
10-08-2003, 11:20 AM
good article... thx for posting

TrippZ
10-08-2003, 12:02 PM
nope. front is GROSS as hell.

seats are groddy too

Just don't dig it :(

Si Death
10-08-2003, 12:24 PM
new design = ugly feces

NamingException
10-08-2003, 12:56 PM
C'mon, guys. You are getting down on a car that drives itself!!!

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11873.jpg

Yes, I know it's right hand drive.

Civicvtec1ps
10-08-2003, 01:10 PM
I like that color of ctr

Civicvtec1ps
10-08-2003, 01:11 PM
dont like those seats and taillights..
color looks good though

dj addicted
10-08-2003, 03:25 PM
people... yes the car looks awesome!!! Dont get me wrong.. but the math comes out to just over 26,600 US Dollars for the car. Kinda pricey for me...

STP03BlueSI
10-08-2003, 03:36 PM
THATS SOME MAD WHEEL LIFT!!!!

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/picture_library/dir_23/car_portal_pic_11873.jpg :shockm:

02TafWhtSi
10-08-2003, 03:54 PM
That dark gray shade really looks classy on the EP :)

STP03BlueSI
10-08-2003, 04:18 PM
looks nice!!!...but still dont like the taillights:smilem:

bloodzombie
10-08-2003, 04:45 PM
Yeah, I totally would've bought that color if it was an option.

I don't know why everyone hates the tails so much

ep3guy
10-08-2003, 04:57 PM
Ok, I want that color. Anyone know what color that is? :D

Rueda del Queso
10-08-2003, 05:28 PM
The weight I got was from the scan. It says 1204kg, that is about 2650 pounds.

03EP3Si
10-09-2003, 06:08 AM
OMG :eek: its beautiful.......... i think its an acquired taste though..

02SilverSiHB
10-09-2003, 06:19 AM
I like it, especially that gret...it would go great with my custom headlights :D
As for it being lighter, I believe it doesn't have a sunroof..saves weight

bratkat64
10-09-2003, 02:33 PM
I'd take the seats (cause my car is solid black), but I'd keep my car for the other aspects.

http://gallery.themspros.com/albums/album25/04euciv_13.jpg

02SilverSiHB
10-09-2003, 02:49 PM
Originally posted by ep3guy
Ok, I want that color. Anyone know what color that is? :D
looks like a lighter tone of the s2000 grey