PDA

View Full Version : My New Dyno Results



Quicksilver
12-23-2003, 01:11 PM
I went to my local tuner shop today (Modacar) to get a baseline dyno run done now that I have the Hondata reflash and replaced my 2 1/4" crush bent mid-pipe for a Comptech 2 1/2" mandrel bent full exhaust. My previous results (translated from a Dyno Dynamics dyno to DynoJet) were 153.2 hp and 127.4 tq with AEM CAI, DC header, crush bent mid-pipe and Hondata intake gasket manifold. It should also be noted that I have 17" rim/tire combo that are 1 lb lighter than stock, but throws the rotating mass out further which can lower the numbers marginally. I also have 2-piece brake rotors that are 1 lb lighter than stock also. So overall, I'd say the numbers should compare close to a person running stock wheels/tire/brakes. And my numbers do approximate out to others that have similar mods.

That all being said, I was figuring I'd put down around 155-160 hp and 130-135 tq. I figured that the Hondata reflash might give me a little gain on the top end, and the exhaust could lose me a little low end torque, but help in the upper end. After the first baseline run, I knew something was wrong. The two follow-up runs confirmed that I was WAY below where I should be power-wise. They were very consistent though, so I don't think it's a fluke. Here's a breakdown of my runs:

Run 1:
Max Power: 145.06
Max Torque: 125.46

Run 2:
Max Power: 145.74
Max Torque: 125.61

Run 3:
4th gear pull (vs. the others done in 3rd) showed a lower results, so they stuck with 3rd. This was just to see if it would make more power in 3rd or 4th.

Run 4:
Max Power: 145.41
Max Torque: 125.68


All of the numbers were done on that latest DynoJet with the latest software and are SAE corrected. The air/fuel ratio stayed between 14:1 and 12:1 (centering around 13:1 for the most part) on all runs after 3k rpm.

Given all that, I am very dissappointed! I know that the exhaust could be partly to blame, but others have shown gains with the Comptech exhaust. I think more likely it's the ECU reflash that's losing me the majority of the power. I knew before buying it to only expect about a 7hp gain at best, and no gain at the worst, but losing 7.5 hp and 1.7 tq by adding a reflash and ECU is just ridiculous!!!

I'll be e-mailing Doug at Hondata to get his opinion on this, but it may be a while since he's over in the U.K. right now. Something just isn't making sense here, but I can't figure out what. I'm just not a happy camper right now. I'll post the dyno page when I get home from work tonight.

myeverlovinsir
12-23-2003, 01:51 PM
Hmmm, sorry to say but that's about what I would expect. Last year we did the exhaust tests on the dyno. Stock flows fairly well. Velocity in the exhaust goes down as you increase the diameter and so does tq. I don't recall anyone testing out a 2.5" mandrel bent pipe, but I know that the 2.5" crush I tried last year showed about the same losses, especially in the tq resonating area of the curve. (~4500rpms). Again, 2.25" crush bent is the largest you want to go NA. Even Joey's 2" mandrel bent pipe showed no gains compared to the 2.25" crush. Which are about equivalent seeing that the crush bends inside neck down to near 2" anyway.

I think you might have been mislead if someone told you that you would get 7hp from the flash. Last year I could not show any gains from 3 EP's stock/modded and then Hondata. Doug was puzzled then and probably still is. I seriously doubt that any dyno results one way or the other are attributable to Hondata.

How is the driving experience?

eurosteez
12-23-2003, 02:25 PM
evil hondata. I wonder if their tunable program(out in feb) could help this?

Quicksilver
12-23-2003, 10:48 PM
Originally posted by myeverlovinsir
Hmmm, sorry to say but that's about what I would expect. Last year we did the exhaust tests on the dyno. Stock flows fairly well. Velocity in the exhaust goes down as you increase the diameter and so does tq. I don't recall anyone testing out a 2.5" mandrel bent pipe, but I know that the 2.5" crush I tried last year showed about the same losses, especially in the tq resonating area of the curve. (~4500rpms). Again, 2.25" crush bent is the largest you want to go NA. Even Joey's 2" mandrel bent pipe showed no gains compared to the 2.25" crush. Which are about equivalent seeing that the crush bends inside neck down to near 2" anyway.

I think you might have been mislead if someone told you that you would get 7hp from the flash. Last year I could not show any gains from 3 EP's stock/modded and then Hondata. Doug was puzzled then and probably still is. I seriously doubt that any dyno results one way or the other are attributable to Hondata.

How is the driving experience?

Here's the promised dyno printout:

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid94/p9b8c09e156b79562319ebdda8d4127c3/fa372c9b.jpg

As far as losing power with the Comptech exhaust, how is it that people like 02SilverSiHB have shown gains running I/H/E vs. I/H? I'm sure there is a chance that I could lose some power with less backpressure on the exhaust, but 7 hp?!? It just doesn't seem probable.

I keep up with the dyno-related threads fairly regularly, so I've seen what you and Joey pioneered for EPHatch. I also saw where all three of you dyno'd before and after result with the Hondata ECU. I know that at the time there were problems with detonation and nominal gains and losses depending upon who's car it was. But if you look at Hondata's own dyno results, there should be at least 2-4 hp gains at the top end. I don't recall the person's name that got their car dyno'd before and after, but they showed around a 7hp gain on a Bosch dyno. Results got even better with a better intake.

Throttle response has stayed the same, both part and full throttle. (i.e. no changes according to the "butt dyno") The only benefit that I've seen is the raised rev limiter. After about a month, I've also seen my gas mileage go from approximately 28.5 mpg, down to 26.5 mpg. I'm not sure if it's the same priciple with our cars, but on MAF sensor(mass air flow) equipped cars, when you open up the intake, you'll generally lean the car a bit. If you open up the exhaust, you'll richen the car up. I'm just wondering whether I've richened my car up due to the exhaust upgrades and it needs to be leaned out to get me the power back. Hondata does say they were tuned for intake only, but would work correctly with other mods as well. Am I way off base here? What do you think?

siver-SI
12-23-2003, 11:03 PM
Well I would say see if you can use someones OEM ECU and try that in your car for a run. That way you know what is losing you the HP.

Quicksilver
12-23-2003, 11:31 PM
Originally posted by siver-SI
Well I would say see if you can use someones OEM ECU and try that in your car for a run. That way you know what is losing you the HP.

I e-mailed Doug at Hondata for his thoughts. Hopefully he can find some free time to help explain the poor results. I'll wait to see what he says. Maybe they'll cover the cost of another dyno run using a stock ECU and see if we can find something.

BTW: Anyone in the East Bay (Northern California) interested in getting their car dyno'd should check out Modacar (http://www.modacar.com). 3 baseline dyno runs, including a/f ratio, for $40! That's a bargain in my opinion.

Quicksilver
12-27-2003, 11:00 PM
I've put my crush bent mid-pipe/stock muffler combo back on. I'll see if I can schedule a dyno run for next week to see how it affects the numbers. There's no doubt in my mind that I've gained back some significant torque in the low end (2500-3500 rpm range), because I've got no more bog down there. Elsewhere, it's too hard to tell. It's also nice to have the exhaust no longer making a bunch of noise and drowning out my bass.

I heard back from Doug and here's what he had to say regarding aftermarket cat-backs and performance:

I have also seen replacement exhaust systems produce less power than stock systems because they are more restrictive. Yes, more restrictive, and noisier. Last week I dynoed a greddy trust catback making 20hp less than a stock exhaust on a Civic type R with Toda cams. In the US I saw a Magnaflow dyno 25hp less than a stock exhaust on a supercharged RSX. In both cases the internal diameter of the rear muffler was about 3 -4 cm. You could see this with a flashlight looking up the rear of the muffler. A restrictive exhaust will drop economy.

Hopefully that is where all my power went. Only the dyno knows... :D

anjapower
12-27-2003, 11:33 PM
hmm...I have a comptech exhaust too....

btw, to add more food for thought, 02silversihb dynoed his car with and w/o the comptech exhaust he used to have, and lost 18whp when he DIDN'T have the exhaust on.

Quicksilver
12-28-2003, 09:12 AM
Originally posted by anjapower
hmm...I have a comptech exhaust too....

btw, to add more food for thought, 02silversihb dynoed his car with and w/o the comptech exhaust he used to have, and lost 18whp when he DIDN'T have the exhaust on.

He must have cursed it before he sold it, because I'm the new owner. :D

Quicksilver
12-30-2003, 02:59 AM
I went back to Modacar to schedule another dyno with the crush bent mid-pipe to try and figure out of the exhaust was the problem. They bumped an Accord exhaust install (since the car wasn't there yet) and got me on the dyno right away. As many conditions as possible were the same. I'd reset the ECU in the morning and let it idle for 5 minutes, drove the same distance, at the same time of day, and under similar weather conditions, and they got my car strapped down and run with a similar cool down period. (Not as clinical as Hondata's recommended methodology, but effective enough)

Here's what we found out. From 4200 rpm on, the Comptech exhaust best run beat the crush bent mid-pipe run by approximately 1-2 horsepower until the 7700 rpm redline. Other than that, the power was spot on compared to the last runs. It was kind of odd too, because even the air/fuel ratio stayed right on top each other on run 2 of 12/23 and run 2 of 12/29. Runs 1, 2, and 3 had some variance between them though in the a/f though. Really weird. Each set of runs within each day was very consistent on all three runs though. No major power variances between any of the runs.

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid95/p8c6b9269d4dd6b2f73887c11dcb32f57/fa23d9b8.jpg

I'm going to shoot another e-mail to Doug and show him the results to see what he has to say. Maybe someone beat the crap out on my car during the 25 miles of test drives before I purchased it? I'll never know for sure. It's just frustrating to have invested that much time, money and effort into all those parts to only be running 144 hp and 124 tq.

On a positive note, because the owner of the shop was so interested in finding out where the missing power was, he was the one that got me in right away. And after I'd shown him the dyno sheet and talked with him a bit about the results, he was nice enough to write me up a "free dyno" voucher on the back of a business card. I think he felt bad because I'd paid for the separate runs to figure out that the exhaust was not causing the power loss. He was also perplexed as to why my numbers were so low. He felt that their DynoJet was about average (or maybe even slightly higher) in it's results when compared to other DynoJets.

I think it's either time for me to go forced induction, or buy a G35 or maybe an Evo. This lack of power really sucks! At least my car handles great...

02SilverSiHB
12-30-2003, 06:28 AM
yes I am still pissed I sold that exhaust! :mad: by the way, did you know comptech makes a silencer for it now if you need it at anytime? check out their site, it's only like 30 bucks.

By the way, it may be your rotational mass thing, never know. Do you still have the stock rims...but then again, you said you have the brake kit, so I assume it's a big brake kit? think it is, if I remember.

Well, this sucks though, now I'm not sure if I care for the hondata :(

Quicksilver
12-30-2003, 10:47 AM
Originally posted by 02SilverSiHB
yes I am still pissed I sold that exhaust! :mad: by the way, did you know comptech makes a silencer for it now if you need it at anytime? check out their site, it's only like 30 bucks.

By the way, it may be your rotational mass thing, never know. Do you still have the stock rims...but then again, you said you have the brake kit, so I assume it's a big brake kit? think it is, if I remember.

Well, this sucks though, now I'm not sure if I care for the hondata :(

I knew they made a silencer, but then you're creating a new bottleneck (in most cases) and losing some of the power you gained by adding it.

It could be the rotational mass, but I shouldn't be losing about 5-10 hp from switching to mildly lighter 17s. Honda Tuning did an article when they increased the tire/wheel diameter and weight by 9.5 lbs per wheel and only lost around 5-6hp on a something like a 118hp car. I kept stock diameter and lowered the tire/wheel weight by 1 lb per wheel. And, yes, I'm running the Wilwood 12" brake kit (2-piece hat and rotors). Being that is saves 1 lb over stock, but does throw the rotational mass out slightly, it should be close to a wash in the power department.

My best guess at this point is that the power was down on the initial (Dyno Dynamics) dyno and that their Dyno Dynamics to DynoJet translation factor of "Dyno Dynamics numbers x 1.15=DynoJet number" could be overly generous. Maybe if it's multiplied by 1.1 or 1.12, that would be a more accurate number. So Hondata may not be the fault in this equation. It just seems odd that I'm the only person that hasn't felt a noticible pickup in part throttle response.

I am glad that I saw a gain with the Comptech. If I'd gone back to the mid-pipe and gained power, I'd have been very dissappointed in Comptech.

Dunrick
12-30-2003, 11:02 AM
There is just no way hondata is making you lose that much power. Just doesn't make sense. 17" rims, even though 1 lb. lighter, are still slower than the stock 15" - 2" in size is a big difference, its probably about 6 lb's in wheel weight. Its post like this I hate, because it makes me want to get an a2, but at the same time, they are needed and good posts. I wish ya good luck. Sucks that you should have to pay for all those dynos. Ephatch.com should pitch in for ya.

Seriously, try another dyno place. Thats all I can think of. It just doesn't seem right that hondata is robbing you of 10 whp.

anjapower
12-30-2003, 05:01 PM
yea man I doubt its the hondata that is hurting you, because worst case scenario, the flash won't do anything powerwise.

Its disappointing to see such results, and like Dunrick said, makes me want to get an A2. You should be in the upper 150whp area with those mods. I will eventually save up for an A2 myself but I want to see how far I can go with this motor. I have similar mods and I want to hit 160whp. Before I thought it would be sure thing, but now don't know. Although it could just be that your car is weaker from the factory?!?

My setup: AEM CAI, Comptech race header, Comptech exhaust, Hondata ECU flash, Hondata IM gasket. I haven't dynoed my car yet but hopefully will do so in the spring.

02SilverSiHB
12-30-2003, 09:25 PM
Originally posted by Quicksilver
I knew they made a silencer, but then you're creating a new bottleneck (in most cases) and losing some of the power you gained by adding it.

oh yeay, I knew that, I was mainly saying that for the just in case it's too loud type of day

Originally posted by Quicksilver

I am glad that I saw a gain with the Comptech. If I'd gone back to the mid-pipe and gained power, I'd have been very dissappointed in Comptech.
darn...then you could have sold it back to me :D

Well man, you never know, sometimes dynos can be flukey. Do you have a 1/4 track near you at all? not sure if you do, that way you could maybe have tested the before an after results with the hondata and all.
But that is sad you don't feel much of a difference at part throttle..not that this could really matter that much, but just curious, what octane are you using?

Quicksilver
12-30-2003, 10:09 PM
Originally posted by 02SilverSiHB
oh yeay, I knew that, I was mainly saying that for the just in case it's too loud type of day

darn...then you could have sold it back to me :D

Considering how much difference in in-car noise I've lost and how well the custom midpipe works for the cost, I'd consider selling it back to you. It seems kind of silly us shipping it back and forth, but if you're game I'd sell it back to you.


Well man, you never know, sometimes dynos can be flukey. Do you have a 1/4 track near you at all? not sure if you do, that way you could maybe have tested the before an after results with the hondata and all.

I have no doubt that the 1/4 miles times would be good conpared to stock. That 900 additional rpms helps us from having to shift into 4th. It also helps the 0-60 times since we don't have to shift into 3rd. That is the part I absolutely LOVE about the reflash. I've never been to the strip, so I might have poor to moderate 1/4 mile times.


But that is sad you don't feel much of a difference at part throttle..not that this could really matter that much, but just curious, what octane are you using?

In California, I'm forced to run 91 octane. Not much else is readily available where I live.

02SilverSiHB
12-30-2003, 10:14 PM
Originally posted by Quicksilver
Considering how much difference in in-car noise I've lost and how well the custom midpipe works for the cost, I'd consider selling it back to you. It seems kind of silly us shipping it back and forth, but if you're game I'd sell it back to you.
you got a pm

Quicksilver
12-30-2003, 10:24 PM
Originally posted by Dunrick
There is just no way hondata is making you lose that much power. Just doesn't make sense. 17" rims, even though 1 lb. lighter, are still slower than the stock 15" - 2" in size is a big difference, its probably about 6 lb's in wheel weight. Its post like this I hate, because it makes me want to get an a2, but at the same time, they are needed and good posts. I wish ya good luck. Sucks that you should have to pay for all those dynos. Ephatch.com should pitch in for ya.

Seriously, try another dyno place. Thats all I can think of. It just doesn't seem right that hondata is robbing you of 10 whp.

After shooting e-mails back and forth with Doug and various people's input on this thread, I'm willing to say that I too do not believe that it's the reflash that's showing the poor results. I'm willing to chalk it up to either 1) a lemon of an engine 2) people thrashed it for the 25 miles before I bought it or 3) it's the rotational mass issue.

After talking to a few performance mechanics, I would consider a swap too. The Type-S head is supposed to be a really well designed unit. But I'd probably go with a 2.4l block with A2 head. If I had the gumption and the knowledge, I'd seriously consider it. But with other car platforms out there that have better stock results and greater NA growth room, I'd just as soon get a new car with a full warranty to fall back on if there are problems.

Don't sweat the cost of the dyno. $40 for three runs is a great price, and the owner's got me covered for my next runs for free. I'm just trying to help continue the research that people like Myeverlovinsir and JSIR were doing when I first got here. It's people like them that should be thanked and rewarded for all their hard work, numerous dyno expenses, and dedication to the platform. Those guys are hard core compared to me. I'm more of an enthusiast. :cool:

myeverlovinsir
12-31-2003, 11:52 AM
Awww thanks!:blushm: :blushm: :m:

Payntech
12-31-2003, 07:22 PM
If you are really looking for a good scientific test on any dyno, you really need to change the exhaust and run it the same day. Air corrections do not take all of the variables out of the equation.

The problem that you were seeing in your opening statement is that the differences in the dynos is not a percentage. We have an AWD Mustang dyno and I will never tell anyone that the power on a Dynojet will "always" be higher as stated on many boards. You were running on a Dyno Dynamics which also is different than the other dynos. To really get a true indication, you need to run on the same dyno and preferably on the same day.

I just dyno'd our 03 Si and we are ready to start doing some testing. I will try and post our baseline on friday.

I am looking for suggestions for what people would like to see for products on this car, I am thinking that they need cams.


Thanks,

EP3ME
12-31-2003, 07:25 PM
Buy a Murcielago man!!!:D

siver-SI
12-31-2003, 10:16 PM
I would like to see what a Hondata Gasket and a Ice Box can do all by them selves. It seems everyone had anouther mod done to the car when they install these parts.

myeverlovinsir
01-01-2004, 02:00 AM
The heatshield is worth the maximum of 5hp if anything at all, this part is subject to heat soak only at a reduced rate. The Ice box is less than a CAI in all respects, only saving grace is its ability to hide from the Cold Air, and water hazardous minds.









HNY
I would like to see what a Hondata Gasket and a Ice Box can do all by them selves.

SiK24
01-22-2004, 12:09 AM
If I read your initial post corectly, your first dyno was done at a different place than with the hondata and exhaust. If this is true, that is where the problem is. Ive been at many different dyno shops and none are exactly the same. As long as they are the same brand, they will be close, but there will always be differences. Thats why you should stay with the same dyno shop to get accurate baseline and improvement numbers.

g_kristian80
01-22-2004, 09:43 PM
A bit off topic, but: I work like a block away from Modacar. I saw a silver ep3 in their shop a little while ago. Have they done work on your car as well?

Quicksilver
01-22-2004, 09:49 PM
Originally posted by g_kristian80
A bit off topic, but: I work like a block away from Modacar. I saw a silver ep3 in their shop a little while ago. Have they done work on your car as well?

Unless the car was out front for about an hour or was on the dyno, then no. I've done almost all of the installs myself.

Quicksilver
01-22-2004, 10:01 PM
Originally posted by SiK24
If I read your initial post corectly, your first dyno was done at a different place than with the hondata and exhaust. If this is true, that is where the problem is. Ive been at many different dyno shops and none are exactly the same. As long as they are the same brand, they will be close, but there will always be differences. Thats why you should stay with the same dyno shop to get accurate baseline and improvement numbers.

I agree with you. In my mind I've thrown away the previous results. I suspect that the AWD Dyno Dynamics "Great dyno equalizer", as they put it, is not as accurate as they would have me believe. 145whp is still low for I/H/E, Hondata, and the intake gasket. Others with the same were getting around 150whp. I was really disappointed I didn't get at least to that number.

I do feel it was well worth the money to dyno the crush bent mid-pipe vs. the Comptech exhaust. The noise was too "boomy" for me and the gains appeared minimal on the dyno. Now that I've sold the exhaust back to 02SilverSiHB, both he and I are happy. He's got his exhaust back and I got to "test drive" it for a while. :D

Now I'm just trying to decide whether to go with an all-out NA engine (Type S head, possibly with K24 bottom), Jackson Racing supercharger, go for a better starting car platform (no Murcielago though), or just live with it for now. My wallet says "Stay where you are for now".

Tenacious G
01-22-2004, 10:38 PM
the initial 153.2 hp and 127.4 tq with I/H/midpipe and heatshield gasket seemed a tad bit high since ~145 whp seems to be the average for I/H/E bolt-ons on the A3.

i also would blame the variance on the differing dynos. i'm guessing weather wasn't too much of a factor since it's always pretty mild and cool in northern california.

speedking604
01-23-2004, 12:33 AM
i'm new.....i dont really get the first post?????can someone make this simple??
what is the stock hp and tq on our car (2002 SIR)????
what did he install???
what is the gain???

actually i was going to buy short ram injen intake/ dc header/ and 2"25 midpipe.i have 5 zigen muffler already. i wanna know how many hp will give me and how many tq to my 2002 sir if i installed them???

please i need help on this. i dont wanna waste money.......for something that dont work well.

Tenacious G
01-23-2004, 10:55 AM
Originally posted by speedking604
i'm new.....i dont really get the first post?????can someone make this simple??
what is the stock hp and tq on our car (2002 SIR)????
what did he install???
what is the gain???

actually i was going to buy short ram injen intake/ dc header/ and 2"25 midpipe.i have 5 zigen muffler already. i wanna know how many hp will give me and how many tq to my 2002 sir if i installed them???

please i need help on this. i dont wanna waste money.......for something that dont work well.

when you ask how much power the A3 has stock, there are two answers. it's 160 hp at the crank, but a dyno measures hp at the wheel, which in stock form usually falls between 135-140 whp (wheel horsepower).

quicksilver's inital dyno was with AEM CAI, DC header, crush bent mid-pipe and Hondata intake gasket manifold ... which produced the 153 whp and 127 wtq on a dyno dynamics system.

he later added a comptech exhaust (gets rid of the custom midpipe) and the hondata reflashed ECU ... but only saw 145 whp and 125 wtq on a dynojet.

here's what we've learned from other posts. a short ram intake may help with throttle response, but power gains will be minimal because you'll be taking in hot air from the engine bay. the DC header's design will give you some low-end. a 2.25" midpipe will free up a little power by helping to move exhaust gases a little more freely. the stock exhaust flows very well, but there's a split between those who think the exhaust only provides looks and sound or if there actually is a power gain to be had.

standard I/H/E usually gets the car to about 150ish whp from what i've seen.

someone correct me if i missed something