Updated information

[iR-VTEC2]

It seems that more and more sites and magazines are learning how to drive.


http://astralaxe.com/pics/eatmyass.jpg

[myeverlovinsir]

7.7 is still high. with hondata your 0-60s are below 7. I remember reading, not sure where, that the stock 0-60 time was reported near 7.2 hmmm, some magazines are more favourable than others of course.

[IceD out N CALI]

better than 0-60 in 8.5 seconds like scc

[ADAMnQuickCIVIC]

anyone who judges a cars performance by a magazine is a moron.
all the mags put my 00 maxima 5spd at 15.3 in the 1/4 mile.
I ran 14.8 @ 95 100% stock, with 150 miles on the car.
i think they let any pimple-faced mail boy "test" their cars.

[SiR Medic]

Road & Track: July 2002

0-60..........7.6
1/4 mile.....15.9@87.8mph
200ft. skidpad..... .81g
700ft slalom........64.6mph



Car and Driver: March 2002

0-60..........8.0
1/4 mile.....16.2@86mph
300ft skidpad..... .84g
Slalom.................69.4
(Test was done in VERY hot weather)




Motor Trend: April 2002

0-60..........7.56
1/4 mile.....15.8@88.1mph
Skidpad.....N/A
600ft slalom.....63.0mph




Just FYI.:)

[DynaSpeed]

trapping 89 seems skeptically high.

[myeverlovinsir]

Originally posted by DynaSpeed
trapping 89 seems skeptically high.

Trap speeds vary drastically with no time base. 89 is definitely doable as is 95, but you can't base everything on the trap speed. ET could be greater or smaller with similar trap speeds. hth:D

[DynaSpeed]

mr. pinetrees -

(sorry. had to :) ) I'm having a hard time justifying your theory of 89 or 95 traps.

How is this possible with a stock Ep? I understand that it has no bearing of ET, but how would a stocker Ep get to those speeds in such a small amount of road?