Close

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. #31
    ephatch member ADAMnQuickCIVIC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Toms River, NJ Shore
    Posts
    2,770
    Originally posted by esmith13
    Yes, that is exactly how it is plummed....

    Eric
    Actually that's how every turbo system is plumbed, it can't work any other way. This is why a cold air intake is unnecessary on an intercooled turbo car.

    Regarding the lightened flywheel, if your turbo is properly sized you should not need a lightened flywheel. Typically it's not a good idea to have too light a flywheel in a turbo car, espcially in a car like a civic. Yes, it may make you rev a bit faster, but inbetween shifts you're going to drop out of boost even faster, causing a poor transition between gears. In other words you're going to bog. You think your car's hard to launch now? Just wait.
    Last edited by ADAMnQuickCIVIC; 12-04-2003 at 02:54 PM.

  2. #32
    Party at the Deakin! sniperSI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    1,435
    Not to mention many guys on honda-tech feel that a lighten fly wheel on tuned car is a 1 way ticket to a main bearing replacement.

  3. #33
    FUCK you! I like 'em!! esmith13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    2,398
    Originally posted by US_Si
    A simple "CO2 Intercooler Spray" search in google (amazing tool :P) yielded this.

    http://designengineering.com/




    Steve
    haha - smartass...

    I didn't know that was the proper name...

    Eric

  4. #34
    Honda+speed=FUN!!! siver-SI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Norhern IL
    Posts
    2,965
    Originally posted by US_Si
    A simple "CO2 Intercooler Spray" search in google (amazing tool :P) yielded this.

    http://designengineering.com/




    Steve
    Any idea how many HP that will give a turbo? Just wondering if it is worth it.

  5. #35
    Registered User nyxie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    far
    Posts
    67
    i'd spend the money on bigger exhaust, or straight pipe, or have a bigger downpipe fabbed up. better yet all 3.

  6. #36
    FUCK you! I like 'em!! esmith13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    2,398
    This turbo comes with a straight test pipe.

    And it has been proven that a bigger downpipe and wider exhaust loose power with this setup. The cybernation turbo kit dyno'd 20HP lower when the piping was 3" than it does now with 2.5"

    I have a hard time thinking CO2 or NO2 will aide much. However, for summertime use a home made water mist setup may be what the doctor ordered...

    Eric

  7. #37
    ephatch member ADAMnQuickCIVIC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Toms River, NJ Shore
    Posts
    2,770
    Originally posted by esmith13

    And it has been proven that a bigger downpipe and wider exhaust loose power with this setup. The cybernation turbo kit dyno'd 20HP lower when the piping was 3" than it does now with 2.5"

    Eric
    Wow, are you sure?
    I've never heard of a turbo car losing power from a larger diameter exhaust, something sounds screwy.
    With forced induction bigger is always better, unlike a n/a car.
    In my old EX i picked up over 20hp switching to 3" over 2.5".

  8. #38
    Honda+speed=FUN!!! siver-SI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Norhern IL
    Posts
    2,965
    Originally posted by ADAMnQuickCIVIC
    Wow, are you sure?
    I've never heard of a turbo car losing power from a larger diameter exhaust, something sounds screwy.
    With forced induction bigger is always better, unlike a n/a car.
    In my old EX i picked up over 20hp switching to 3" over 2.5".
    I think it is are engine setup. From reading it seems like the K series like some back pressure. No matter what the mod is if there is a 3" on the car it is losing HP not gaining from what I have read.

  9. #39
    FUCK you! I like 'em!! esmith13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    2,398
    Originally posted by ADAMnQuickCIVIC
    Wow, are you sure?
    I've never heard of a turbo car losing power from a larger diameter exhaust, something sounds screwy.
    With forced induction bigger is always better, unlike a n/a car.
    In my old EX i picked up over 20hp switching to 3" over 2.5".
    I am 100% sure. It's one of the reasons I had to wait 4 months for my kit. 3" kits dyno'd at about 240HP and 2.5" kits dyno'd at about 260HP EVERY time....

    Funy isn't it??

    Eric

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •