Close

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    ephatch member EP3CHRiS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    138

    Rim offset questions.....cant get my head around this!

    Hey guys, i'm pretty lost about this and i would hopefully like to get it cleared. So, i'm in the market for a new wheel and tire set up in the near future, but am doing my homework now so i dont make a mistake later. I am looking at getting a set of Enkei RPF1's for my 02 Civic EP3. Now, i do have some questions about different offsets with this rim because i think there are some RPF1 set ups that look decent, then theres others that look like garbage. I am thinking of running a 17x7 with a + 30 offset. Now, some rpf1's have a "bubble" look to them. i want to make sure i DON'T have that look. Here's an example of a good look vs the bubble look. what do you guys think?? 17x7 +30 nay or yay?? any pictures would do some good too

    Thanks

    17x9.5 +38 good


    17x8 +35 bad

  2. #2
    Site Sponsor PatrickJamesYu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pomona/ Claremont, California
    Posts
    1,235
    The 'concave' only starts I believe with the 9" widths
    WTS: 17" beater wheels 4 lug, Dell Studio 1555 Laptop, Volvo Lip, Nikon mount lenses, BuddyClub wing, and more. PM me.
    http://www.ephatch.com/forum/showthr...110#post935110

  3. #3
    ephatch member jed_averill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    710
    Miah I heard runs a 17x9 +22 with a bit of negative camber. Stance is sex.

  4. #4
    Site Sponsor PatrickJamesYu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pomona/ Claremont, California
    Posts
    1,235
    that doesn't answer his question at all haha


    As long as it's 9" wide, it will have concave.
    My buddy had 17x9 +45 and even at that high of an offset it had the look you want.
    Though a +45 wont fit on an ep.

    It'd have to be +35 and lower.
    WTS: 17" beater wheels 4 lug, Dell Studio 1555 Laptop, Volvo Lip, Nikon mount lenses, BuddyClub wing, and more. PM me.
    http://www.ephatch.com/forum/showthr...110#post935110

  5. #5
    ephatch member EP3CHRiS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    138
    ok, so i posted on hondatech, and i believe i got my answer, check it out,
    thanks for the help

    http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2971362

  6. #6
    ephatch member EP3CHRiS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    138
    posted from one of the members on HT, this is exactly what i mean with this "bubble" look

    "i know exactly what he means by "bubble" look

    the inside spokes arent completely flat on the second picture.

    i think on the rpf1 that is attributed to the width more than the offset.
    the wider the wheel the flatter the spokes
    i dunno why that is. i've never seen 17x7 or 17x7.5 rpf1 with flat spokes(if someone has please enlighten me)

    bottom line if you want to get rpf1 with flat spokes
    you have to get the wider sizes and smaller offset

    imo it's not worth the extra weight just to get flat spokes, but to each his own.

    im also in the market for rpf1
    looking for 17x7 +45 or 17x7.5 +48 (5x114.3)"

  7. #7
    Site Sponsor PatrickJamesYu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pomona/ Claremont, California
    Posts
    1,235
    Cool yeah my friend was on the market for rpf1's for a while
    and from what I've learned from him is that the flat look doesn't start till 9"
    WTS: 17" beater wheels 4 lug, Dell Studio 1555 Laptop, Volvo Lip, Nikon mount lenses, BuddyClub wing, and more. PM me.
    http://www.ephatch.com/forum/showthr...110#post935110

  8. #8
    PaNdA PoWeR 27rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz Ca.
    Posts
    3,821
    Yup you need 9's or wider. Also offset doesn't affect the spokes when you go 9''+. The only part that changes on a 9"'+ RPf1 is basically just the center part where the lug nut holes are. Lower offset more material. Higher offset less material, but the spokes stay the same. Anything below a 9" width RPF-1 wheel will have the "bubble" look to it no matter what size or offset it is. And i believe 9's or wider are only available in 17's or higher.


    -Rob

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by PatrickJamesYu View Post
    Cool yeah my friend was on the market for rpf1's for a while
    and from what I've learned from him is that the flat look doesn't start till 9"
    yeppp that's too bad, i wonder why flat spokes only are 9"+
    im just sucking it up and buying 17x7.5
    i'd rather have lighter wheels.

    and lol OP you posted this on HT and here. you're welcome =]

  10. #10
    ephatch member EP3CHRiS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by 27rocks View Post
    Yup you need 9's or wider. Also offset doesn't affect the spokes when you go 9''+. The only part that changes on a 9"'+ RPf1 is basically just the center part where the lug nut holes are. Lower offset more material. Higher offset less material, but the spokes stay the same. Anything below a 9" width RPF-1 wheel will have the "bubble" look to it no matter what size or offset it is. And i believe 9's or wider are only available in 17's or higher.
    Quote Originally Posted by NEO_FOLLOWER2 View Post
    yeppp that's too bad, i wonder why flat spokes only are 9"+
    im just sucking it up and buying 17x7.5
    i'd rather have lighter wheels.

    and lol OP you posted this on HT and here. you're welcome =]

    Thanks for the info guys, now i know what has to be done....good thing i did my homework before making a HUGE mistake. So here's the big question.....17x7 + 30 or 16x8 + 38???? with the 16's, i could run a real nice beefy tire, like a 225/50, but with the 17's i dunno....what you guys think?

  11. #11
    Site Sponsor PatrickJamesYu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Pomona/ Claremont, California
    Posts
    1,235
    Quote Originally Posted by EP3CHRiS View Post
    Thanks for the info guys, now i know what has to be done....good thing i did my homework before making a HUGE mistake. So here's the big question.....17x7 + 30 or 16x8 + 38???? with the 16's, i could run a real nice beefy tire, like a 225/50, but with the 17's i dunno....what you guys think?
    depending on look or performance you're looking for
    I'd do the 16x8 and run a fat tire.
    WTS: 17" beater wheels 4 lug, Dell Studio 1555 Laptop, Volvo Lip, Nikon mount lenses, BuddyClub wing, and more. PM me.
    http://www.ephatch.com/forum/showthr...110#post935110

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    398
    id do 17 with 225/45

    but thats just me

    smaller sidewall but not too small and the wheel size stays close to stock still (04-05 stock size)

  13. #13
    PaNdA PoWeR 27rocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Santa Cruz Ca.
    Posts
    3,821
    Quote Originally Posted by NEO_FOLLOWER2 View Post
    id do 17 with 225/45

    but thats just me

    smaller sidewall but not too small and the wheel size stays close to stock still (04-05 stock size)
    I'm with this guy. If you're looking for handling this is the way to go between the two.


    -Rob

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •